Quitting is not an option.

“If the Jan Lokpal Bill is not passed then….I would quit as the Chief Minister of Delhi.”
“If power politics is not sorted out in Delhi, Kejriwal will quit his CM office and sit on a Dharna”
“If the police officials will not obey his orders, Delhi CM will quit from his primary duties and will stage protests.”
All these statement have been made by Delhi Arvind Kejriwal in fewer than 2 months of being the CM of Delhi. 
I have had a lot of respect for Mr. Kejriwal and the fact that he was able to organize the India Against corruption movement. His political acumen is par excellence as he has able been able to tap the anger of the middle class against the established political system.
When he was a activist, I supported his call to Sheila Dixit to quit as she could not control the law and order situation especially among women in Delhi. I supported his call for her to quit over the CWG scams. I even supported his initial action to form a political party as I thought he would want to fight it from within. I wanted him to be bring in transparency to the system and not to resort to the castist and communal vote bank politics.

The fact that he got an golden oppertunity to prove his model in Delhi. To be the change. It also gave him a platform to experiment and remove the kinks in his implementation. As every engineer knows, that you need to make a prototype before you do mass production. Arvind from IIT should have this in his DNA.
But as a CM, in a position of power, I do not support his call to quit every time something does not work his way. That is a quitter or blackmailer mentality. Every role you have, will have constrains and you need to work within the constrains to give the best solution possible and do as much of good as possible.
He should now start appreciating the difficulty of the role Shelia Dixit had to do. With all the limitations of the Delhi CM, she still managed to get world class infrastructure in Delhi. Does that not make her a better administrator than Arvind Kejriwal.
I have been an entrepreneur and a manager in many companies. I have never quit when things were bad because I had the power to  improve them. If I have been blessed with the foresight to see the change, then I have the duty to make it happen. I have vented out my frustrations of not being able to make the change as fast as I would have liked but I have tried my level best to work with the other stake holders to work on a middle ground.
Another thing I have learnt is that if you have got to a situation, where you need to threaten to quit, you well might quit, because even if the compromise has been reached, it will never be the same ever again even in best of situation.

Arvind Kejriwal may know politics but he does not understand simple administration. I would anytime hire a good administrator rather than a amazing political mind.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Selfish Organization: How Internal 'Selfish Genes' Sabotage Organizational Success

Image
The second law of thermodynamics tells us that entropy drives systems toward equilibrium and disorder. In his final shareholder letter as CEO of Amazon, Jeff Bezos referenced Richard Dawkins' "The Blind Watchmaker" to illustrate how natural selection counters entropy by building complex life through energy-driven processes. Bezos urged Amazon to resist the entropy-like pull of complacency by staying in "Day 1" mode—continuously growing, innovating, and dynamically adapting to trends rather than following predetermined designs. While this advice resonates for maintaining corporate vitality, a deeper examination through Dawkins' evolutionary lens reveals a more insidious challenge lurking within organizations themselves. The very mechanisms that help companies survive external entropy may be generating internal evolutionary pressures that undermine efficiency and threaten long-term survival. The Gene's-Eye View of Organizations Richard Dawkins' rev...
Read more

Monkeys and Alligators: My ADHD Journey

Image
In 2023, at age 49, I received the diagnosis that transformed my understanding of myself: Attention Deficit Hyperactive disorder (ADHD). For years, I had navigated episodes of anxiety, depression, and anger, developing coping mechanisms that somehow kept me afloat. But that year, the depression became overwhelming. I needed help. What pushed me to seek support was my sister. During her medical studies, she had studied ADHD extensively. With the frankness only a sister can provide, she said, "You're a textbook case of ADHD." Her words were simultaneously shocking and deeply familiar. The psychiatrist confirmed both types: inattentive and hyperactive. The moment he spoke those words, a weight lifted from my chest—a burden I hadn't realized I'd been carrying. I had always known I was different, but could never name it. Now I had a map to understand my own mind. The Medication Revelation My doctor prescribed atomoxetine, starting low. For weeks, nothing changed. ...
Read more

The Battle for Economic Dominance: The new cold war

Image
  The grand chessboard of global power has transformed dramatically in the 21st century. Where nations once measured strength through nuclear arsenals and ideological allegiance, today's geopolitical contest revolves around economic systems, supply chains, and financial infrastructure. This represents not merely a tactical shift but a fundamental redefinition of power projection on the world stage.     The Dollar Kingdom and Its Crumbling Walls   At the center of the post-war economic order stands the U.S. dollar—the world's primary reserve currency and the cornerstone of global trade. Yet this dominance contains within it a fundamental contradiction known as the Triffin dilemma . To supply the world with sufficient dollars for trade, America must maintain persistent deficits, effectively exporting currency instead of goods. This creates an impossible balancing act: simultaneously maintaining a strong dollar as a stable reserve asset while running deficits t...
Read more